I wrote a post last year about preparing for the lab practical, which was as much for students and myself as it was for readers of this blog. This year, however, I felt I did a much better job with it.
Since I didn't grow up in New York myself, I was not familiar with the Regents examinations. Sure, I took a few practice tests just to get a feel for them, but I had no idea what a true monster they are. I also didn't know (and am still unsure) about what is an appropriate amount of prep to give students. All three labs on the practical are known and I gave students standard/general versions of them throughout the year during the corresponding units. However, last year, I found that students struggled with the timing (only 9 minutes per lab) and with even small changes from the labs I had given them. I didn't have much time to review the labs before the practical either.
This year, I strove to remedy those problems. I emphasized the lab practical from day one and helped students work on skills such as rounding and reading directions. While these skills seem basic, most of my students - even the strong ones - struggle with them and end up doing poorly on the exam. When May rolled around, however, I started getting nervous about the timing. Throughout the year, labs that I thought should take a single period ended up stretching for two or even three. How could I get my students ready for the test?
I turned to my ever-trusty resource: the Oneonta ESPIRIT listserv. I asked other Earth Science teachers from across the state how they handle the timing, whether they practice it or not, and what the state regulations are.
Unlike usual, the listserv failed me completely.
Half of the responses I got said of course, help students practice (without giving them the exact test questions) and the other half said absolutely not, you will lose your job! Tough choice between helping my kids succeed and possibly losing my job. Whether right or wrong, I decided student achievement was more important than saving my own behind. I created a lab similar to that on the exam, with three sections. None of the questions were taken verbatim and students had to use their ESRT instead of being given the charts they needed. None of the rocks and minerals they had to identify were used on the actual test.
Even with this prep, some of my students complained on test day that they didn't know what to do, while others refused to believe that the practical would actually be taken into account in their final Regents score. In glancing over the tests, however, I was relieved to see that many of my students did quite well.
But at what cost? I feel that today, with the high pressure for teachers to get students to pass the state tests, there is greater and greater likelihood that teachers will start spoon-feeding students these labs. Teachers are so often asked to make professional judgments about how to follow regulations and it can be nerve-racking and overwhelming for a new teacher. The union and veteran teachers will tell us to protect ourselves at all costs, but we became teachers to promote student learning and achievement. When asked to make a choice between the two, teachers can become paralyzed or make poor choices. I still don't know if what I did was the right thing to do, but I don't think I broke any rules.
Only time will tell if this will come back to haunt me, but if it does, I will stand by my decision and my students' right to study for the lab practical.