This morning, I read an Op-Ed piece in the New York Times entitled The Limits of School Reform (Joe Nocera). In this article, Nocera writes that "good teaching alone can't overcome the many obstacles [a student] faces when he is not in school." I find myself drawn to this argument because it is both relieving and a bit dangerous.
Nocera argues that school reform these days downplays students' background and home life to the point where they seem to be arguing that it doesn't even matter. Yet not everyone buys into this. While I agree that blaming students' home lives (and thereby exonerating teachers from all blame) is ridiculous and has the potential to create a school system riddled with teachers who are just there for the paycheck. It would leave students exposed to situations where no one cared about their learning.
However, to completely ignore the effects of parental involvement, neighborhoods where these kids live and their socio-economic status would be like ignoring the genetic component while treating someone's medical condition. Students are certainly affected by where they come from, who they live with and the amount of exposure they get to things like books and new places. While this doesn't mean that we should give up trying to help students from difficult backgrounds, it is something that needs to be addressed in the reform process.
Many educators feel the same way. Nocera references another article about Ramon Gonzalez and the changes he made at a high-need school in the South Bronx. Gonzalez is seen as a critic of the reform movement because he disagrees with a lot of the experimentation that has gone on in the school systems.
I can relate to that since, as a NYC Teaching Fellow, I do not feel I was adequately prepared for the classroom. I had good grasp of the concepts to be covered and I was energetic and motivated, but I had little in terms of real teaching skills. Thus, the students I taught last year were my "guinea pigs". I tested new strategies on them, and when those didn't work, I tried new ones. As a result, few of them were prepared to take the Regents and they went on to 11th grade chemistry having truly learned few of the concepts I had hoped they would. It is unfair to students to set them back a whole year because I was trying to figure out what to do.
Much as I think the Teaching Fellows is a great program, bringing energetic new minds into the teaching profession, I have reservations about the damage it can do to students. In fact, all first year teachers are pretty bad and Teaching Fellows are at least intensely dedicated to improving. Perhaps the problem is larger - we need our teachers to go through more rigorous training and enter classrooms already prepared to do a good job. Of course, there will always be room for improvement, but I think we owe it to our students to not use them as lab rats.
Overall, I think there are many ways that school reform has made progress, but it also needs to undergo more change to truly impact our school system in a meaningful way.

In an effort to stay positive, I have started recording one positive thing about each school day. This is something I strongly recommend to all teachers, especially new teachers at this time of year. It is actually very relaxing and focuses my energy on the good things, because believe it or not - no matter how bad it gets - there is always something good.